All times are UTC

Welcome to creationvsevolution

You are currently viewing our boards as a guest, which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community, you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content, and access many other special features. In addition, registered members also see less advertisements. Registration is fast, simple, and absolutely free, so please, join our community today!
Search found 138 matches
Search these results:

Author Message

 Forum: Cosmic evolution   Topic:   ミズノmp59小さ目なものにすることも出来る         

Posted: Tue Jun 04, 2013 7:44 am 

Replies: 1
Views: 314

Nihongo wa wakirimasen!

English only!

 Forum: Origin Of Life   Topic: depth of space dust on the moon proves young age of earth

Posted: Sat May 11, 2013 2:45 am 

Replies: 4
Views: 864

Now, obviously this forum has died in its tracks. Its creator, Crazynutsx, is a young young-earth creationist who, like so many like him, jumped in with no idea what he was doing. Finally, he abandoned his own forum. I just check in every once in a while to see if there's been any activity. Joe Lync...

 Forum: Origin Of Life   Topic: depth of space dust on the moon proves young age of earth

Posted: Fri May 10, 2013 5:46 am 

Replies: 4
Views: 864

I did some original research on this claim, sparked by my witnessing Dr. Henry Morris of the ICR using it in debate in 1985. He claimed that a 1976 NASA document used direct measurements of meteoric dust infall to show that if the moon were really billions of years old then there should be a layer o...

 Forum: Age Of The Earth   Topic: 6000 years

 Post subject: Re: 6000 years
Posted: Fri May 10, 2013 5:19 am 

Replies: 5
Views: 536

Peter left altogether, the ultimate evasion. To tie this loose end, Peter's theology's answer to the question, "What are you supposed to believe when the earth is shown to be much older than 6000 years? Which is what the evidence does show", is dead wrong. We've heard that answer from coun...

 Forum: Other   Topic: Kitchen Suppliers Cardiff

Posted: Wed Jan 30, 2013 10:20 am 

Replies: 2
Views: 348

I cannot help but remember Rose Tyler's reaction. She thought she was visiting 1860 Naples. No, it was 1860, but she was still thrilled with visiting the past. Uh, it wasn't Naples, but rather Cardiff. She suddenly became far less thrilled.

 Forum: Age Of The Earth   Topic: The age of the earth! (Based on well written article)

Posted: Wed Jan 30, 2013 10:17 am 

Replies: 5
Views: 908

No, rather the reason why people do not believe in God and creation is because of creationism ! Creationism demands that we must decide between blatantly obvious facts and the belief that if those blatantly obvious fact are nonetheless true, then Scripture and God has no meaning whatsoever. If you p...

 Forum: Macroevolution   Topic: Macroevolution is imaginary not a fact!

Posted: Mon Jan 07, 2013 5:56 am 

Replies: 1
Views: 305

Nonsense! And that your source is not up-to-date on "Nebraska Man" shows us just how much to trust your source. "Nebraska Man" was "discovered" in the early 1920's. It was based on a pig's tooth, that is true, but that tooth had been turned in its socket and the resulta...

 Forum: Debate Videos   Topic: Creation Videos

 Post subject: Re: Creation Videos
Posted: Sun Aug 26, 2012 12:23 am 

Replies: 5
Views: 839

Evidence of God: Physics What is the probability of your own personal existence? Of all the possible genetic combinations available at the moment of your conception, what is the probability that that one sperm just happened by chance to have penetrated that ovum? Pile on the probability of that ovu...

 Forum: Is Creation A Science   Topic: Is creation a science

 Post subject: Re: Is creation a science
Posted: Sat Aug 25, 2012 11:03 pm 

Replies: 6
Views: 927

The evidence shows overwhelmingly that what you interpret the Bible as saying is false. What Bible? Which canon? What is its history? KJV? Interesting. Do you know why King James had commissioned that translation of the Bible? Because the then-current translation didn't work for his political ambit...

 Forum: Logistical Problems For Noah's Ark   Topic: The Flood never happened and so logistics are irrelevant.

Posted: Sat Aug 25, 2012 8:29 pm 

Replies: 19
Views: 1896

I know that the "L" word is considered dirty, but nonetheless learn some geology. Here's an article I wrote for CompuServe back circa 1990: . Go to this link and take the time to watch this. ...
Sort by:  
Page 1 of 14 [ Search found 138 matches ]

All times are UTC

Jump to: